Jump to content

User talk:74.96.187.96

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sockpuppet investigation

[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DJ Devilsman, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Magitroopa (talk) 17:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2021

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 15:37, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 16:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

74.96.187.96 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry for personally attacking you what I did was stupidly wrong. I was too obsessed with revenge and too self centered. I'm really sorry Magitroopa and Uncle G. What I did was incredibly wrong and idiotic of me to even do. I never should have done those things. The truth is, is that I'm just really upset with my own life. And I shouldn't have taken out my problems on you guys. I'm a million times sorry, I really hope the you guys can accept my apology. 74.96.187.96 (talk) 15:41, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:38, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

74.96.187.96 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand what I did was wrong because I personally attacked other editors and its something that I might never be able to take back. I really want to try again because what I did will never back forgiven. And that some of the edits I did have made a few editors unhappy, and I promise to make edits that other editors will be happy about and not make other editors angry and unhappy.74.96.187.96 (talk) 16:48, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. If you can't properly remember your account and password when you log on, you really have no business editing Wikipedia. Your stated excuse is like telling the police that since you kept forgetting your keys you went into your neighbors' houses to spend the night. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I still fail to see how this addresses your sockpuppetry. --Yamla (talk) 17:22, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla you see, every time I tried to log into Wikipedia, I always forgot what my account username and password are every time. so you see, that's why I have sock puppetry, its because I can't remember account correctly. and by the way please tell this to Magitroopa. --74.96.187.96 (talk) 17:28, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the User talk:74.96.187.96 article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. --Yamla (talk) 20:55, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla, Daniel Case, Magitroopa, Uncle G. Ever since I was permanetly blocked from The Masked Singer Fandom. Things for me haven't been the same. And if I'm unblocked, I know I can do better because People aren't defined by their past. They can grow and change for the better. And Uncle G, Magitroopa and every other editor out there should know that they themselves have done some bad things in their past. And have fully regret. And I can help Wikipedia and The Masked Singer Fandom, If I'm given the chance again. And if I get the chance I swear to god I will never commit sock puppetry again.74.96.187.96 (talk) 17:19. 16 September 20121 (UTC)

You've gone out of your way to demonstrate you will not or cannot contribute constructively to Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 17:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

74.96.187.96 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yamla, I know and I'm a million times sorry. I should have just done constructive edits. I just need another chance please. I'm beggin you, please. And before I send this And Evie from Masterchef Junior her last name was Babcock. And I think Talulah was some how related to Mireille Pollet. 74.96.187.96 (talk)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Acroterion (talk) 03:14, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There is no improvement or recognition of the central issues here. Revoking talkpage access. Acroterion (talk) 03:14, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]