User talk:76.72.63.16

August 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Global warming controversy, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Red Phoenix ^talk 02:14, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sorry...all I did was correct your choice to include biased and utterly unsubstantiated opinions as "facts". My facts were more easily verifiable than yours.

I'm sorry your teachers never bothered to teach you critical thinking or how to apply common sense to reality.

And now you've taken away my ability to correct your hateful and totally non-factual lies. On Gavin McInnes' page you call him a "neo-fascist" despite the irrefutable fact that he is about as far from being so as is possible to be. He fights against fascism with his every breath. If you won't allow the "community" to correct your idiotic lies, stop pretending you are anything but a propaganda site for the progressive movement.

I see in numerous places where you falsely accuse conservatives of being "alt-right". What good are definitions if you leftist scum choose to change and make them up as you go along?

You people really do have no shame (or common sense, souls or self respect).

November 2020

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Talk:Jack Posobiec—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 03:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at Talk:Great Reset, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. FrederalBacon (talk) 02:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No harrassment...this was complete fact, easily verifiable

your choice to feel insulted by simple, factual statements about yourself isn't my fault. 76.72.63.16 (talk) 22:12, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 08:55, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So statements of pure, verifiable fact which are relevant to the discussion at hand are against your policy?

Well, this doesn't really surprise anyone...facts and wikipedia have never really gotten along very well...a site that prides itself on being an extension of the democrat party, pushing their propaganda while pretending to be impartial sure as hell couldn't give two shits about reality...

Keeping my notes for the liable suit when we finally take back congress and get your protections lifted...

save your money asshats...you're gonna need it. 76.72.63.16 (talk) 05:25, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Talk:2020 United States elections, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Talk pages should be used to suggest edits to pages. Making incivil comments on talk pages is against Wikipedia policies. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 22:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're human excrement...and I'm REALLY stretching with the human part. 76.72.63.16 (talk) 06:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 05:31, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.