Jump to content

User talk:77.76.200.196

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copying and pasting plagiarized content 5/5/2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm BlitzGreg. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to HandyGames because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!

May 2014

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Happy Attack Dog (Bark! Bark!) 14:55, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to HandyGames may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • In cooperation with the Scottish partner YoYo Games<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.yoyogames.com/ |title=YoYo Games}</ref> HandyGames™ equips a complete

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Handy Games Vandalism

[edit]

I have left you a response on my talk page. BlitzGreg (talk) 16:22, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, 77.76.200.196. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article HandyGames, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:37, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at HandyGames shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Hello, Can we please discuss this content dispute at the talk page? Thanks, Happy Attack Dog (Bark! Bark!) 15:02, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]