User talk:7amood40

Welcome!

Hello, 7amood40, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Loser vancouver, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Stephenb (Talk) 11:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Loser vancouver

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Loser vancouver, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Stephenb (Talk) 11:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fojer

A tag has been placed on Fojer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. VQuakr (talk) 10:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rolex, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 07:12, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 23:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

7amood40 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was logged into a public computer in the airport. I believe that some children were using my account for vandalism. I will change the password of my account to prevent this from happening again. 7amood40 (talk) 23:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I'm not buying the excuse, but you get another chance. Use it wisely. Acroterion (talk) 00:50, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have these children been vandalizing the Kings College article in exactly the same way in the past couple of days from another account? They're awfully organized if they are.

I will unblock, but if I see any hint that multiple accounts are being used for more vandalism on that topic, I will block, for good. Acroterion (talk) 23:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what their intentions were. I'd be happy to undo those changes. How would I go about doing that?

I've taken care of it. Acroterion (talk) 00:56, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]