User talk:80.117.138.54

sant'Antonio

the correct spelling is "DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Padova", damn!!! --'''Attilios''' (talk) 09:51, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Where is the source for your addition? --'''Attilios''' (talk) 12:20, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

March 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Basilica of Saint Anthony of Padua. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 13:18, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Same-sex marriage. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe Decker (talk • contribs) 07:19, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DMacks (talk) 12:18, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Syrthiss (talk) 13:26, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

---