User talk:92.250.119.63

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

92.250.119.63 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have made improvements in some articles edited by a so called sockpuppet and othrrs related to them, and I got blocked as the forementioned sockpuppet. For what I saw, the behaviour of this editor administrator has been the same towards other editors, even minor ones, in the amount of edits or in the articles edited. This is abusive and has to stop. It's an entire waste of good work. 92.250.119.63 (talk) 22:23, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Balogna. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:25, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

92.250.119.63 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

On what grounds?! None? 92.250.119.63 (talk) 22:30, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 22:38, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've been dealing with your socking for years. You still haven't figured out what a honeypot is. Anyhoo, back to WP:DENY.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What? I don't even know you! A honeypot must be some area where a sockpuppet wanders, and everyone else around there also gets branded by fifth rate administrators. 92.250.119.63 (talk) 22:38, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bunch of mad people, or they wouldn't spend their miserable lives in front of a computer, persecuting others. 92.250.119.63 (talk) 22:52, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.