User talk:95.168.107.28

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.168.107.28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I blocked without any report and any reason? Is it because I have contested the closure request and I actually had valid arguments? I've just started to expose the bias and then you block me without amy explanation95.168.107.28 (talk) 20:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A reason has been given, "logged out editing". Please speak to that. 331dot (talk) 21:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

331dot. I'm affraid we have bigger problems here. The IP is correct. Bbb23 has started blocking this editor for various reasons. None of which are correct. This all started when the IP has made a valid points in the closure request and when he indeed proved bias. This has bad smell all over it. Bbb23, please address this. The reason you gave is incorrect. It would be good to cease before this escalates more. First you blocked him with explanation "Disruptive editing" and now with the reason "logged out editing". Trimpops2 (talk) 22:16, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what your interest is here, but if you have a grievance with Bbb23, you should go to WP:ANI. I would think very carefully about it before you do, as your actions will be examined as well. 331dot (talk) 22:48, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He was the next in line to be blocked by Bbb23. Bbb23 started blocking everyone who participated in that closure request.95.168.107.28 (talk) 23:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

95.168.107.28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

331dot. Can I be unblocked if I prove to you that this isn't correct?

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=[[User:331dot|331dot]]. Can I be unblocked if I prove to you that this isn't correct? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=[[User:331dot|331dot]]. Can I be unblocked if I prove to you that this isn't correct? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=[[User:331dot|331dot]]. Can I be unblocked if I prove to you that this isn't correct? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

For maximum fairness, someone else should review your request. 331dot (talk) 23:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Ok. Then this question is addressed to the other reviewer. Thank you. 95.168.107.28 (talk) 23:48, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.