Jump to content

User talk:AML

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

FOUNDATION:

The Australian Monarchist League, although originally a part of the International Monarchist League (est. 1943), established itself as an independent Australian body in 1993.

PURPOSE:

The primary purpose of the Australian Monarchist League is to educate and inform the Australian public on Australian history and particularly on the Australian Constitution, to disseminate literature and to maintain a library on Australian colonial and federation history and the Constitution. The League also conducts seminars open to the public for the purpose of teaching Australian colonial and federation history and all aspects relating to the Constitution.

STRUCTURE:

The Australian Monarchist League is incorporated as an association in New South Wales. It is a not-for-profit membership based organisation and has no paid staff whatsoever and is run totally on a voluntary basis. It is headquartered in Sydney, Australia. Some years ago, the League established a Trust with a number of prominent Australian businessmen as Trustees. The most important role of the Trust is to raise and administer funds.

MEMBERSHIP:

The database of the League currently comprises 17,194 persons, but the actual membership of the League as at 24 December, 2009, is 2,957. The League has branches in all six States and in the Australian Capital Territory. All office bearers are elected and all members have a say in the organisation.

AFFILIATIONS:

The Australian Monarchist League is not associated with any political party and has no formal association with any other organisation.

________________________________________

EXTERNAL LINKS:

http://www.monarchist.org.au/

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=38130235703&ref=ts/

Australian Monarchist League

[edit]

Hi. If you have particular problems with the article, it would be far better if you could raise them on the appropriate talk page. As has been mentioned, continually reverting changes is simply a quick way of getting your account blocked, and won't result in the changes you are looking for. It would be far better to engage other editors in discussion. That said, I'm not sure what the problem is - the two versions are substantially identical, with only a couple of differences here and there, but one is partially sourced and formatted to meet Wikipedia's style. If you could explain what the problems are, I'd be very happy to discuss them with you and we should be able to make changes where appropriate. - Bilby (talk) 02:14, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Australian Monarchist League. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. NW (Talk) 02:17, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Extended to indef. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 02:23, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think, AML, that you misunderstand the purpose of Wikipedia. The article on the Australian Monarchist Leaguie is an encyclopaedia article about the organisation. The article, like other Wikipedia articles, must follow Wikipedia policies like maintaining a neutral point of view, being verifiable and using reliable sources. It must also follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style as far as formatting goes.

A Wikipedia article is not free web space for an organisation to present itself as it sees fit. See also WP:OWN for a further discussion.

As Jake Wartenberg notes above, if you have issues with the material presented in the article, you can raise those concerns on the articles talk page. Regards, Ground Zero | t 14:30, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:AML banner.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 10:12, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]