User talk:Aalijanpour

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject!

Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:

Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
We write for a general audience. Every reader should be able to understand anatomical articles, so when possible please write in a simple form—most readers do not understand anatomical jargon. See this essay for more details.

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! Tom (LT) (talk) 00:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shatt al-Arab

Thank you for your interest. We don't use ownership to determine place names. We use common usage in the English language. After a detailed study, we determined that Shatt al-Arab is the best way to refer to this river. Rklawton (talk) 16:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC) would you please mention the reference of your "DETAILED STUDY" cause I don't know what is your reference, this river was inside in Persian empire from thousands of years and is in the border of Islamic republic of Iran and the name is ARVAND not shat al Arab, this river is not belong to Arabs completely.so please confirm the changing or at least add the ARVAND too.[reply]