User talk:Abhisekh basu

January 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Hindustan Times, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. jp×g 09:15, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Sarita. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. jp×g 09:16, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at The Bombay Chronicle, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. jp×g 09:16, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Hindustan Times. jp×g 09:16, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. jp×g 09:31, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 11:41, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Times of India, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Deccan Herald, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Navbharat Times, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kpddg ^(talk) 05:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Free Press Journal. — DaxServer (talk) 10:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 10:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]