User talk:Academicsuitepf

This is Academicsuitepf's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roger Horowitz (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roger Horowitz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 23:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Academicsuitepf! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 23:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Jamiebuba Definitely I am willing to learn how to improve this an other entries. I will definitely visit Teahouse, thanks for letting me know about it! Academicsuitepf (talk) 15:27, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Academicsuitepf, I'm really sorry this article was declined twice when he's obviously notable both as a professor and as an author. I've accepted it now. One thing you can do to help make it more obvious that an academic meets basic notability guidelines is to show that their books have been widely reviewed or had significant influence on later work. Reviews are obviously easier to find. I've added a couple to the article. -- asilvering (talk) 23:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I appreciate it. Academicsuitepf (talk) 10:42, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]