User talk:Acoldnukacola

Welcome!

Hello, Acoldnukacola, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 14:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dominion Voting Systems, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:05, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

will I censored again if I posts relevant news sources that completely disputes the disinformation I removed? Acoldnukacola (talk) 17:12, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If they are reliable sources, you may be able to introduce new information. However, it is highly unlikely that sources indicating, for instance, that Joe Biden did not win the presidential election or that Dominion engineered voter fraud, will be reliable. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:14, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That in itself is censorship, what is Wikipedia's approved guidelines for "reliable sources"? Because there are highly respected news sources that vehemently dispute what you are censoring. Acoldnukacola (talk) 17:24, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, it's not censorship, and I'm not censoring anything. I'm adhering to Wikipedia's consensus-based community guidelines, which state that reliable sources (explained in the link) are sources that have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. See also Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable_sources. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]