User talk:Ada Kohlmaier-Sims

Laure Prouvost

Please remember to remove the "in use" template when you have finished editing and don't leave it for days like previously, please also remove the inappropriate image you added. Theroadislong (talk) 13:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Laure Prouvost, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Laure Prouvost shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Theroadislong (talk) 14:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Laure Prouvost, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Laure Prouvost. Theroadislong (talk) 14:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

edit warring notice

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:56, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Laure Prouvost) for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]