User talk:Adil Javed90

June 2023[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 20:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I shall be careful in the future. Although, I cite a link as reference of the text. However, Thanks for your concerns. Please keep informing such type of things for a better and qualitative addition of knowledge and infortamtion from my part. Regards Adil Javed90 (talk) 10:13, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please also let me know about the particular article you are talking. It will be helpful for my correction. Adil Javed90 (talk) 10:15, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. [2] MrOllie (talk) 13:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

dear Mr Ollie, this wasn't an attempt to advertise or promote. I am student of International Relations. If you find this in the way you are talking please accept my apology. Regards Adil Javed90 (talk) 21:12, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. MrOllie (talk) 15:21, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly advice[edit]

@Adil Javed90 Came across one of your recent edits and studied few of your previous contribution efforts along with discussion on (this) your talk page.

I have following advice

International relations can be polarizing topics, rather than using random sources from google I would advice to use https://scholar.google.com/ to search topics of your liking. In that too keep checking what kind of specialization authoring professors/ academics are having.

Medical sciences affect human life we need to be care full to confirm reliability of sources rigorously. Before adding any info to Medical science articles get acceptability of your sources confirmed at WP:RSN

Wikipedia has lot many rules which will take it's own time to learn them so maintain slow space.

Happy editing

Bookku (talk) 03:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am grateful for your kind suggestion. Please keep adding your input for the improvement of new editors. Regards Adil Javed90 (talk) 04:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding external links to the body of articles.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is written with an apology if I have voilated standards. Although it was not intended and a deliberate act. Please unblock me and guide me So I can avoid such inconvenience in the future. Thanks and best regards. Adil Javed90 (talk) 20:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]