User talk:AdnanAhmadSiddiqui

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

AdnanAhmadSiddiqui (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

AdnanAhmadSiddiqui (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "AdnanAhmadSiddiqui". The reason given for AdnanAhmadSiddiqui's block is: "Vandalism".

Blocking administrator: Jimfbleak (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: This is not an autoblock, and you have not addressed the reasons for the block. Huon (talk) 02:45, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

It seems that you are/were operating the following account(s):

AdnanAhmadSiddiqui (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
AdnanSiddiquiMokalpurHanswar (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:04, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AdnanAhmadSiddiqui (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AdnanAhmadSiddiqui's blocked by Anna Frodesiak (Adnan Ahmad Siddiqui(Article) 12:55, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You still haven't given any reason for unblocking. (You need to understand that you can't use Wikipedia as a hosting service, and avoidance of block by using alternate accounts is strictly prohibited.)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I repeat once again: unblock request without an unblock reason will not be granted. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 13:11, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AdnanAhmadSiddiqui, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Ya sh ! 12:46, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted article

I have deleted the article you have posted on your talk page. A blocked user is allowed to edit his talk page so that he can explain the situation and make an unblock request, not so that he can use it as a personal website. If you post the article again, I'm going to block you from editing your talk page as well. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 07:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am fulfilling my promise and blocking you from editing the talk page as well. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AdnanAhmadSiddiqui, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Ya sh ! 10:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AdnanAhmadSiddiqui, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 02:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]