User talk:Adriansim9594
|
Sungai Buloh-Kajang MRT Line edits
[edit]Sorry to inform you that your edits have to be reverted because you have included unnecessary information in the list of stations table. Also, you did not provide references for your added content. Pls be considerate and stop adding thank you. Also I bet you have not read my reversion summary. Please read it as well as provide an edit summary as you are encouraged to. VKZYLUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 16:40, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for the talk and sorry for not noticing on the reversion notes. Firstly, I am actually editing based on the standard according to other pages from other railway lines. And, of course, sources are included as well, which is from the Malaysia MRT Official Website (Link: https://www.mymrt.com.my/public/sg-buloh-kajang-sbk-line/stations/). I do not know is it that you have overlooked on it or for some other reason. Secondly, I do not understand why you need to put the opening date for the stations, in fact, it is already mentioned at the section before the list of stations. And I am the one which find that totally unnecessary at all. Another thing is that I do not know why you go and remove so many information which makes me think that you are making many peoples' effort in a waste. In fact, I think such information is vital. Please explain in details and be convincing as what I have said previously, and I hope you explain to other people especially people who have contributed to the information that you attempt to remove. If you think so and you manage to convince people who have contributed to that information, you may remove all those information that you think is not necessary, and you need to do it for ALL TEN of the railway lines, in order to make it a standard. I am just trying to standardize the table so that all vital pieces of information are included and try to maintain to be the same for all of the railways' lines. One thing that I would actually like to give a condemn is that why is there a column ("Position") which has no information at all? Supposedly you should have the knowledge and not asking people to fill in the blanks. If you can't provide or no information can be included for that, please consider removing the column. I hope you can make the table to be full instead of leaving a column empty just like that since most of them can be full. Thank you very much for the kindest level of your consideration.
Best regards,
--Adriansim9594 10:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC+8)
- Actually what I intended to do was to standardise the tables with the new formats that are more up to standards. You see, I actually follow the standards from UK articles which Im tryna bring to he Malaysian ones. Unfortunately, I do not have as much time to do it due to commitments in real life etc. The position is actually meant for coordinates which I’m trying to place them but I haven’t got the time to when I was editing it. Wikipedia has its policy and one of it is WP:Not A Guide. The unnecessary info I removed is the station layout and park-and-ride etc. It’s because wikipedia is also not a WP:MIRROR which is preferably to be placed on websites like MyMRT. The information on wiki is maybe additional information but is certainly not a railtard guide. Who wants to know whether the platforms are stacked or side or island in the first place when they just want to get to places that’s all. And im trying to pursue good article status for this precious article. Also the references you placed are not inline citations. It may be there in the reference list but it is not adequate in context so it should be an inline citation unless I have overlooked which I apologise. Hope you understand what I’m trying to do now :) VKZYLUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 03:31, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- If you don't mind, can you give some sample pages that you have done so that maybe I can try to help to improve on it? About the position, what can I do is refer to Google Maps and put on the coordinate. You do have a good initiative but maybe not all of them can accept that changes. Hope this helps.
- Best regards,
- --Adriansim9594 16:26, 7 November 2018 (UTC+8)
- As a reference I use articles like Victoria line which has recently been promoted to good article status. Then there's also Hammersmith & City line. I'm planning to work on the BU-Klang line article but it doesnt seem pretty stable right now until the line opens that is. Then there's SSP line, Kelana Jaya and Ampang and Sri Petaling lines. =D Well it doesn't really matter if people can't accept it because we have Wikipedia policies to guide and cover for us =D VKZYLUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 09:21, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |