User talk:Agrippina Minor
Edits to Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray
[edit]Cantwell's and Murray's endorsements of Clinton came before the Washington caucuses, so it's rather POV to say their endorsements of Clinton were made despite Obama's strong showing in Washington. In Cantwell's case it was made two months in advance of the caucuses at a time when Clinton was the "frontrunner" in the election. Additionally, superdelegate's decision to endorse someone is entirely different than whether or not they will cast their vote for that person come convention time. --Bobblehead (rants) 20:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- If it is so important to you, then we can keep the endorsement of Clinton in their articles, but you can't use the "despite her state's support of Obama" wording without a source that actually supports that they are doing it despite their state's support of Obama. Wikipedia has several policies that prevent that kind of unsourced wording in articles about living people. --Bobblehead (rants) 21:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Nastia Liukin
[edit]Regarding your recent deletions from Nastia Liukin: please request sources and discuss matters on the Talk Page before deleting sourced information out of hand. Otherwise, your edits may be seen as disruptive and reverted. Thank you. DanielEng (talk) 21:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nastia Liukin, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.DanielEng (talk) 22:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Nastia Liukin, you will be blocked from editing. DanielEng (talk) 22:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Victoire
[edit]Logic says so, but not the source. qp10qp (talk) 21:10, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
The source is wrong. I'm reading a book on Catherine right now. Will find a correct source. Agrippina Minor (talk) 21:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- You don't need to, because I've swapped the balance round in the footnote to match your edit (both possibilities were cited). I looked it up in several places when I was working on the article and there is no consensus. You know what I think? No one knew: the Venetian ambassador who said it was Victoire who died in the womb was probably acting on hearsay. The name Victoire is, however, a clue, I admit, as to which twin survived. qp10qp (talk) 21:44, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Agrippina Minor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Agrippina Minor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)