User talk:Aliakbar8

February 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User:Vipinhari has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 11:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at SpongeBob Comics. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: SpongeBob Comics was changed by Aliakbar8 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952146 on 2016-03-01T13:54:24+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Manila, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Manila was changed by Aliakbar8 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961386 on 2016-03-01T13:57:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Commando.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Commando was changed by Aliakbar8 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921733 on 2016-03-01T14:02:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Zppix. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dod Orsborne has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Girl Pat (1935 trawler). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Commando, you may be blocked from editing. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:06, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aliakbar8, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 18:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]