User talk:AliceCybernetics

Your sandbox

Hi, I just took a look at your sandbox. It looks like you are drafting two articles on one page - that never works well for a variety of reasons. You should create separate subpages for each draft. I can do it for you if you like. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:02, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please user:Dodger67! AliceCybernetics (talk) 14:12, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Hope you like it.

Take a look at my sandbox, I have a few "semi-active" drafts on subpages and I also use the "main sandbox page as a temporary "scratch pad" for constructing tables, complex citations and other complicated bits and pieces that would be difficult or disruptive to do directly on a "live" article page.

BTW you have a reference to "Oxford English Dictionary" in one of the drafts - I'm afraid your reference needs to be far more specific than that. You should mention the actual entry in the dictionary, the page number and the edition you're citing - like this: "Banana" Concise Oxford English Dictionary 15th ed. 2003, page 158. - you can optionally also include a brief quote from the source in the citation. Hope this helps. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:48, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Richmond Scientific Society moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Richmond Scientific Society, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Richmond Scientific Society

Hello, AliceCybernetics. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richmond Scientific Society, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Richmond Scientific Society

Hello, AliceCybernetics. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richmond Scientific Society".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:00, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Richmond Scientific Society RSS Logo Green.jpeg

The file File:Richmond Scientific Society RSS Logo Green.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Image of a unnotable topic that has since been deleted. No obvious value in transferring to Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 14:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]