User talk:Alihussain2014

Welcome!

Hello, Alihussain2014, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Qwyrxian (talk) 10:11, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ghoganwali

A tag has been placed on Ghoganwali, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

I don't know if this is a hoax or cluelessness; but it can't be a "village" when the higher level organization is itself a small town. Without reference to verify existence, we cannot keep this in mainspace

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:11, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice

As reviewing administrator, I didn't speedy delete it, because there is no reason to suspect a hoax, but there need to be some sources--at least a map showing it. I advise you to fix the problem, and do this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. DGG ( talk ) 18:09, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghoganwali for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghoganwali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghoganwali until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:44, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Phalia was changed by Alihussain2014 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882716 on 2012-12-03T16:10:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:10, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alihussain2014, you need to stop. There was an extended discussion on Ghongawali, in which we decided that, without sources, we could not have that page. You cannot just overturn that decision on your own. Wikipedia is a collaborative environment, and since there is a consensus that we don't have enough info for an article on that village, you cannot try to force one. If you continue to try to do so, or disrupt other articles like you did at Phalia, I will block you. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:03, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Abusing multiple accounts

Please do not abuse multiple accounts, as you did at Ghoganwali, to repeatedly revert to your version of the article. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:24, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]