User talk:Allendaves

License tagging for File:Rotation v spin Parent 1.png.png

Thanks for uploading File:Rotation v spin Parent 1.png.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Preview button

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Number of the Beast, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Let me know if you need any help with whatever it was you were trying to do. --McGeddon (talk) 17:15, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Number of the Beast, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 18:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello. Could you explain where you're getting the slideshow images from? If it's from a reliable, published source then its conclusions can be summarised in the article somewhere (there's no need to embed every image of the slideshow as a thumbnail). If this is your own personal analysis of Biblical texts, then I'm afraid it goes against the Wikipedia policy of original research, and cannot be included here. --McGeddon (talk) 18:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

please stop

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Evening. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. —BurnDownBabylon 22:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

You must discuss your edits on Talk:Evening rather than silently reverting to your version of the page. —BurnDownBabylon 22:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Edit warring. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

At Evening, per a complaint at WP:AN3#Evening. Editors are expected to patiently search for consensus rather than repeatedly force material into the article. In case of disagreement, you should wait to get support on the Talk page for your edits. EdJohnston (talk) 00:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Evening has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Direct copy of... this website Frozen4322 ^{Talk Stalk} 18:39, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure that there is any copyright violation. It seems likely that http://wiki.trytop.com is a mirror of Wikipedia. Nonetheless, there still does not seem to be any consensus to insert the religious material that Allendaves is keen to add to the Evening article. EdJohnston (talk) 19:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC)