User talk:Alotbsol

I think you linked to the image in good faith

I don't think it's your problem ... that's why I just spent 10 minutes over on commons requesting deletion of the image, and didn't put any kind of warning on your page. Look at her head. Her neck would be growing out of her sternum, and the light's wrong. Kww (talk) 12:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also the picture is not a fair use picture as required in bio articles and is a blatant rip off of a paparazzi picture widely published in celebrity sites. It has been tagged as such on Commons. The uploader was not truthful about ownership - he has a history of doing this. --NrDg 13:22, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have also noticed that in your upload history you have uploaded at least 2 obviously copyrighted by pros pictures on EN Wiki and claimed them as your own, much as this picture was done on commons. Conclusions are obvious. Suggest you be careful about copyright and particularly claims of ownership of other people's images. --NrDg 13:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Stacy keibler 02321.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Stacy keibler 02321.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 11:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 15:16, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]