User talk:Alybood

Welcome!

Hello, Alybood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page John Entwistle did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. creffett (talk) 01:50, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at John Entwistle, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. creffett (talk) 03:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Entwistle Bio edits

I am the woman with John Entwistle when he passed. Google my name and it will be all over the place. I do have the coroners report, legal documents that show I sued entities for slandering me in the sitiation. My name jas always been a part of his wiki page. I simply put it back always Alybood (talk) 03:20, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Going to edit it with this FACT that was previously there for years

I changed it again to include my name with a link to my book that clearly states who I am. My name was previously part of this bio of John Entwistle for years until recently so why the change now? Fact is, Alycen Rowse,me, wS qith John that night and I was the ONLY INE. Alybood (talk) 03:27, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on John Entwistle. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. creffett (talk) 03:28, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. creffett (talk) 03:28, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alycen Rowse was part of this bio for years

My name, Alycen Rowse, was previously part of this bio for over a decade. It is fact and is part of my book, which is 100% a reliable source for 6 years now. It was improperly removed from the bio and should be reinstated. You are simply harssing me now. Put it baxk or faxe legal action you tirant Alybood (talk) 03:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are manipulating facts by removal

It is you that is manipulating facts of John's death by removing the truth. Go look at the history of his bio page and see my name has been a part of it. You have 2 years writing here? Ha! You need to learn how to check archives and facts. Look it up, google it, you will see it is you harassing me with your removal. Alybood (talk) 03:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. creffett (talk) 03:35, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are violating my legal rights

As I have stated previously, your removal of my name is illegally slanderous as it was previously a verified part of this bio for over a decade. I am a previously approved fact of this wiki bio and your repeated removal and accusing me of lying in my edit is a slandeeous action to my public image which I make a living off. Again, my name was a previously verified fact of Entwistle bio. Period. I have havingreliable source is defamatory to the Alybood (talk) 03:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The legal issue is with cerefett

I can say that your removal is slander and intentional defamation especially since my fact in this bio was already a previously verified fact for over a decade. So it is your actions that can be viewed as harassing, defaming and intwntuonally so.n Alybood (talk) 03:43, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to John Entwistle. TheEpTic (talk) 03:49, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --creffett (talk) 03:51, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not Vandalizing Anything

I am NOT vandalizing anything by replacing a previously verified fact that was on this bio for over a decade. The removal of previously verified facts and continued, repeated harassment by Cerefett and their removing said previously verified facts that were part of a bio for over a decade is defaming to my public legacy and living. Fact is, I, Alycen Rowse was with John Entwistle on his death. Wiki allowed it for over a devade as it waa previously verified. This person has now crossed into legally defamatory territory by removing facts and callind me a liar. Period. Wiki knew for over a decade that Alycen Rowse was a verified fact. Cerefette only now has a personal grudge against the fact that is me. And is only retaliating out of spite despitw the absolute fact that wiki can go back and see my name was there previously as a verfied FACT. It is my personal legal right as the woman in question, to put it back. factconsidered slanderous, harassing and Alybood (talk) 03:56, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! We appreciate your input on this article, and are not doubting anything you say. Wikipedia is built upon facts, and those facts must be cited from a source. If you could provide sources to what you're adding, nobody will revert it. As it stands, it appears creffett has created an incident at the Administrator's noticeboard. --> Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Legal_threats_by_User:Alybood_on_their_talk_page - I highly suggest you respond to that before making any further changes or risk being blocked. Thank you, and I hope you resolve this soon! TheEpTic (talk) 04:04, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did respond

And I do, as the person in question, have a legal right to address their harassment, defamatory actions and did provide a few sources that were verfiable. Also, again, as I have stated previously, my name was previously verified. And by the person posting this disagreement publicly could be considered even more intentionally defamatory actions to my public name. Alybood (talk) 04:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 04:22, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Last chance

This is your last chance to withdraw your legal threats, refrain from any further personal attacks and aspersions. You need to conduct yourself in a manner that befits an encyclopedia editor. There is dispute resolution (and accompanying requests) that can help you, if you patiently take the time to study them. But your conduct thus far has been far below par, and that has consequences. El_C 04:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Less than 60 seconds on google to find another source to verify this information should have been tried by someone, instead of ^^^ the way this was handled ^^^. It's not like something like this wouldn't have an easily discoverable independent verifiable RS. User:Alybood, just say you withdraw any and all perceived legal threats or you will not be unblocked. And then do not make any more. They take it very seriously here, even words like slander and libel, etc., as they are considered "legal threats" since those words have actual legal meanings ,other than just throwing them around on the internet, and using them will get you a permanent block. Oh, and, the info is back, and cited to an independent source. You're all welcome, He iro 04:58, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]