User talk:Amali de Alwis

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Amali de Alwis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mike Peel (talk) 14:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gouri Chindarkar article[edit]

Hello, thanks for writing this article! I've just read it and I have to say I'm not sure this person is notable in her own right - what I see on her is coverage on her education and attending an unusual course, but I'm not sure this counts as sustained coverage by Wikipedia's standards. (I have to say I also don't like creating articles on people for achievements as children and feel it's preferable to wait until they've begun a notable career.)

Are there any more sources you can add about her? Let me know if you have any thoughts about this. Blythwood (talk) 12:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gouri Chindarkar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gouri Chindarkar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gouri Chindarkar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 15:58, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]