User talk:Ambb2003

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Fernando Fischmann, it could result in a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment with the syntax, please use the Sandbox. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

→→ Dear Orangemike, I’m sorry but I can’t agree with you in this occasion. Please explain how my last editing can be describes as “disruptive”. All new information I added follows Wikipedia’s guidelines: there is no original or personal research, everything is written from a neutral point of view, without any personal analysis or opinion. All claims are substantiated and backed with links to third party references taken from the international press and from third party organizations. I think that this time, at the very least, the information on industrial solutions should be maintained as these information complements the current bio (these things are the subject’s brainchild) , there are currently industrial projects underway using these technologies and they have the validation of US agencies such as USPTO. These constitute a relevant part of the subject’s work. I’ll be waiting for your reply.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ambb2003 (talk • contribs)

The language used was not neutral, but rather promotional, full of peacock words and generally reading like it was taken from a press release. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:07, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

→→ Hi Orangemike, as per your latest edit, in the text on industrial solutions I'll replace the word "Solutions" for "applications", but please tell me what other terms you consider peacock words.

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fernando Fischmann may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:46, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

→ Hi BracketBot! Thank you very much for your help. I'm already fix it.