User talk:Aminur Rahman,Khosru

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Aminur Rahman,Khosru (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

84.167.23.118 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Frankfurt55". The reason given for Frankfurt55's block is: "account claimed to be compromised (or an impersonator, or lying about WP:COI)".

Blocking administrator: Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Now blocked directly. Max Semenik (talk) 21:49, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Frankfurt55 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Max Semenik (talk) 21:49, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aminur Rahman,Khosru (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here:1)My account has been determined as sock account of Frankfurt55,which is not true.2) We are two diffrent persons.3.I am new in wipipedia and have not yet edited any article,nor I have used my Address yet.4.Even then if there is some mistakes determined it is not done with my knowledge.5.I should not be blamed for others mistake.6.It was not known to me that it is not allowed to use others address,once I use the address of Frankfurt55 but I wrote my name there.It means I never wanted to hide my identity.Why Shall I shall do that?I am a free person and allowed to write every thing with sources.7.I am became victim of being useing this IP address.This IP address is used by many persons.Now all of us should suffer for this.8.In future I shall be very careful about my used ID,I shall not allow to use my ID to others nor I shall use some one ID 9.I accept my mistakes and i shall be careful about my mistakes in future

Decline reason:

If you are not Frankfurt55, and you have not made any edits, what mistakes have you made that you are acknowledging here? It looks to me as if you are saying you are Frankfurt55, in which case the unblock request should be made there. It also looks as though you are saying that more than one person used that account. This is a rather confusing request - I would suggest that you should be honest and avoid tangled lists like this. Peridon (talk) 09:33, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've fixed your unblock template so that it actually works. If you aren't Frankfurt55, why does your username matches the title of artcle created by him, in addition to both of you having the same IP? Do you know Frankfurt55? If unblocked, what kind of edits are you intending to make? Max Semenik (talk) 09:02, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aminur Rahman,Khosru (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here: Many many thanks to fix my reasons of appeal in right section. In fact we are new in wikipedia and do not understand a lot of it.We do not know what to use and where to use we are close to sixty and computer is a big chapter us.It is very difficult question,I actually do not know why he adopted this user name.Only I know he lives in a street which number is 55.I know him personally.He is our club secretary.He knows me too,we all are member of same club.We came Germany in the same year due to political repression of Military Goverment of Bangladesh.We belong to same political organisation. He was a freedom fighter either.Like many others he also knows about my activties during our freedom fight. He is a writer and regularly writes article in Bangladesh Newspaper. He useto edit in wikipedia and told me about 2 months back that I found Operation Jackpot in Wikipedia but the commanders name is not written correctly,as he knew that I was commander of Operation Jackpot Mongla. He also told me in order to edit the mistakes he needs some references,I gave him two books and a journal and he edited the Operation Jackpot,as well as Bangladesh liberation war which are mean while reverted by Admin Future perf.at Sunshine.He told me he can write biography of me.I told him its not necessary,but he wrote the biography. After that it was deleted by Fut.Pef. at Sunshine then Frankfurt 55 again apply for unddeletion this was reviewed by Admin Gerame Barlett,then again it is tagged by Fut.Pefr. at Sunshine to be deleted.I know him very personally,we all are member of same political party and same club.We are using our club PC thats why we are having same IP address.Frankly,I shall not edit any article because I have seen Frankfurt55 edit with book references and these were not accepted by Admin Fut.Pef.at Sunshine he reverted all edits.I have also noticed that all edits are to be approaved by many editors and Admins.Frankfurt 55 has created a bad impression on Bangladesh to Admin Fut.Pefr. at Sunshine,but in reality it should not happen.He should know how to manage a crocodile if he is an animal of water.An Admin here is very powerful,all new editor must be able to gain faith and respect from Admins and other editors.Only than he staying in Wikipedia will be useful. I am not writer,thats why I can not edit a lot,but If I could, then I would edit my biography and deleted it.Because there is a saying in Begali language if the villagers does not obey you do not try to be a boss.Here Admins are not liking us,it means if even I am very notable person my biography will be deleted.I do not know if the honourable Admin Fut.Perf at Sunshine will see this but I am begging aplogy to him for any kind of bad behaviour or bad activties created by Frankfurt55 which makes him annoyed. I am currently Chief Adviser of German Awami League,I am Convener of Freedom Fighters Association of Bangladesh in FRG and I am the President of Bangladesh Club in Germany.I never ever faced any problem here in FRG but many of our country men became direct victim of many kind of social problem.I have learned a word from my parents that is do respect and get respect.May be I have to leave Wikipedia but even I leave,I beg apology for two mistakes,One while he was logged I edited an article but even then I wrote my name I signed my name,its an article of my party Awami League,Secondly while I saw Frankfurt55 was having conflict with honourable Admin Fut.perf at Sunshine,I should have make my account and ask for apology to Admin Fut.Pef.At Sunshine. Now I unable to edit a page so I can not write a message to him.But I am writing once again to delete my biography and please excuse me for our mistakes.I am known to all most all Bangladeshi living in FRG as I help people gladly and I shall always keep my voice lower.I am very sorry for the inconvinience and remain.)

Decline reason:

I'm again having trouble understanding most of this (please separate your sentences some), but I have a few questions:

Who is "we," you and Frankfurt? Accounts may only be used by one person, for security and copyright reasons. How many people have access to this account?
You have a conflict of interest in relation to articles about yourself and your organizations and should not be editing them. If unblocked, what other areas do you intend to edit?
Is it your intention to make edits on behalf of Frankfurt55?
Are you familiar with User:Yaguldu? Hersfold non-admin^(t/a/c) 18:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aminur Rahman,Khosru (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here: 1)Here we means we the same aged Bangladeshi Community in Frankurt Germany.Frankfurt55 has acess to this account only and I used his accounts once or twice to edit my party article as some one wrote Awami League is not affiliated with EU and US Parties where I wrote an answer and signed my name.But I do not have acess to that account.Actually Frankfurt55 wanted to write in favoure me but during writing he was warnned by Aditya Kabir first and then by Fut.Pef. at Sunshine.He should have stopped this all right at that moment.I was one of the commander of Operation Jackpot and under my command 6 six ships were destroyed in Mongla port on 15th August,1971.Its also true that I was the youngest among all commanders of Operation jackpot.Its a well known facts throught the world.I do not need any biography. 2.)Yes I shall not edit these articles any more as these are about me and about my party .I am not good at writting and I shall not edit for the time being. 3.I have no intentions to edit on his behalf neither I shall allow my account to use by other. 4.I am not familiar with Yaguldu.

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry, meatpuppetry, and sharing accounts among multiple people are all against Wikipedia policy - and all are valid reasons for a block. As you've just admitted to the latter (at the very least), we have no choice but to decline your unblock request. Also, if you are indeed "well known throught[sic] the world", then it's extremely unlikely that your article would be deleted. Also, I agree with the comments below; your repeated unblock requestss show no signs of understanding Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and therefore I have revoked your talk page access. If you truly wish to have your article deleted, you can attempt to do so by contacting WP:OTRS at info-en-qwikimedia.org; if you wish to request unblocking, please contact WP:BASC at arbcom-appeals-enlists.wikimedia.org. However, given the above, I would suggest you spend some time editing - and following policy - on the Bangladeshi Wikipedia before taking the WP:STANDARDOFFER. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:32, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment)This latest unblock request admits to allowing others to use this account and the person behind this account using other's accounts. Based on the repeated requests that don't appear to be getting any better, I suggest revoking talk page access and directing the user to invoke the ArbCom appeal method as there's no evidence that the sharing is not stopped. Hasteur (talk) 14:09, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've already declined one, so I won't decline this appeal, but I'd agree. Shared accounts make attribution of edits, which is required by Wikipedia's licenses, extremely difficult, and open security risks besides. I do not expect that your account will be unblocked. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:52, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably all a lie anyway. It's a single person; the whole "Frankfurt55 and Aminur R. K are two different people" story was nothing but an ill-conceived WP:LITTLEBROTHER excuse from the start. By the way, "Frankfurt55" and "Aminur Rahman,Khosru" have been sharing not only their Wikipedia account, but also their e-mail address. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:18, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re to your Email

I cannot speak to the likelihood of the Arbitration committee accepting your appeal for unblocking as I am not a administrator or an Arbitrator. Follow the advice given above in your last declined unblock request. At this point I consider the matter closed Hasteur (talk) 18:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]