User talk:Amsterdamx

Civility

Your comments on Talk:Tabitha Smith are way out of line. Please learn to behave like an adult. I have blocked you for 48 hours for your egregious incivility. Future blocks for future incidents will be longer. Nandesuka 21:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:110031-boom-boom 400.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:110031-boom-boom 400.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nomt10.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Nomt10.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

in-universe

Hi - most of your writing is in-universe, that is to say you are writing about fiction like it is real not like it is an object of the narrative. Articles are being cleaned up to remove the in-universe viewpoint and it's not particular helpful to add to the workload by adding material of that type. --Cameron Scott (talk) 16:49, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael Kenworthy

The article Michael Kenworthy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:Notability, no sources, seems as if it was written by the actor

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]