User talk:Anand k. Rana

December 2020

Hello, I'm Blablubbs. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dhanusadham, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Blablubbs|talk 16:02, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions – such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks – on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Blablubbs|talk 16:03, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

General note: Removal of content without adequate explanation

Sir/Madam, I'm Dr.Pinsky. I noticed that you have recently removed content from an article Caste system in Nepal without adequate explanation. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.Dr.Pinsky (talk) 15:24, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sahu, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir/Madam, please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Sundhi. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. Thanks.Dr.Pinsky (talk) 14:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Sir/Madam, you may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Caste system in Nepal. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 13:19, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello, I'm Dr.Pinsky. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Caste system in Nepal have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 10:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sundhi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 10:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sudhi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 17:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sundhi, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great work at sundhi/ soundik / Suri

You are doing a great work don’t know why Pinsky (editor ) is giving wrong info as it’s Dalit or sc in West Bengal . Request to provide correct information and need to train Pinsky 2405:201:1007:A0B0:8E:3096:A0F7:478B (talk) 21:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sundhi. Chariotrider555 (talk) 13:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sundhi

You are right sundhi is not sc Please edit I am unable to do so JockerEdit (talk) 13:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]