User talk:Anas2048

November 2007

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Comparison of database tools. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 23:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Comparison of database tools, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Comparison of database tools was changed by Anas2048 (c) (t) deleting 13415 characters on 2007-11-23T23:37:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:38, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Comparison of database tools, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Collectonian (talk) 23:51, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Comparison of database tools

A tag has been placed on Comparison of database tools, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Collectonian (talk) 00:15, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Comparison of database tools

A tag has been placed on Comparison of database tools, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Collectonian (talk) 00:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of Comparison of database tools

I deleted this article originally because it only had one product in the chart, serving in a way as an advertisement of the one product. Recreating the article will not address this flaw in the article. It's also my opinion that the title of the article is too broad a target for such an article. Server databases? Personal databases? If you wish to write an article on this, I'd recommend, at a minimum, including 3-4 products. More importantly, be more specific about what category of products is to be included. If you have any questions, please ask me. Cheers, Pigman☿ 00:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've unprotected the article - you should be able to re-create it now, if you want. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 05:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello Anas2048, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Pigman☿ 02:39, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recreating deleted pages

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 19:07, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review

I've taken the article to Deletion review here. I thought that was best because of the number of admins who had deleted the article. Please be patient with the process. Unless there is a quick decision, it may take five days for this process to complete. Thanks. Pigman☿ 20:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pleased to tell you that opinion in the Deletion Review has been strongly in favor of keeping Comparison of database tools, the article you started. The review is not over but I doubt the article will be deleted. I've restored the last version you edited with a full text at that point. Please accept my sincere apologies for the rush by myself and others to delete the article. It did not deserve that. If there is anything I can to to help you on Wikipedia, please do not hesitate to ask me. Again, I'm sorry for your poor treatment in this matter. Cheers, Pigman☿ 02:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion review has been closed in favor of keeping the Comparison of database tools. Again, if you need help, ask me or the others involved in this matter. I know I feel badly about this case and I suspect they feel likewise. Best, Pigman☿ 20:03, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article take overs and renames

Your recent edits completely replacing the Bleach article with the contents of the Bleach (manga) article, followed by a redirect, were completely and wholly inappropriate and have been undone. Article renaming is NOT done in such a fashion, and consensus is needed before doing any such drastic action. The chemical Bleach is the most well know usage of the word, so it properly has the article name of "Bleach" with no disambiguation. The manga series is properly named per the Anime/Manga and overall Wikipedia naming conventions. Please be more careful about such actions in the future as some could consider it vandalism due to the improper way you handled it. Collectonian (talk) 13:13, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Join user Group Wikmedia Morocco

Hello, I am contacting you because I have seen that you are a Moroccan Wikipedia users. In October 2015, we have created a Moroccan Wiki user group, it is gathering all Moroccan/interested in Morocco Wikimedians in order to be together and discuss common issues. Morevoer, being in a group gives the opportunity to have events and participate in Wikimedia conferences. Please join us on the group in order to make our Moroccan community bigger. You can do that either by contacting me or by joiging the facebook group by searching "ويكيبيديا المغرب - ⵡⵉⴽⵉⴱⴻⴷⵢⴰ ⵍⵎⵖⵔⵉⴱ - Wikipedia Morocco" Regards -- Anass Sedrati (talk) 12:35, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]