User talk:Andrea.bersi

October 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Behzad Leito has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Behzad Leito was changed by Andrea.bersi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874608 on 2017-10-16T10:08:07+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:08, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Switzerland has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Switzerland was changed by Andrea.bersi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923983 on 2017-10-20T09:47:51+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Apple Inc..

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Stop spamming Wikipedia with unencyclopedic content. Stop writing personal commentary or anything without a reliable source as per WP:RS. Do not edit until you learn what an encyclopedia is. Users can be banned for this. — Smuckola (talk) 09:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Amir Tataloo. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lordtobi (✉) 09:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock account[edit]

I have 41 edits, and I had not any problems, I have not received any Sabotage messages. I was doing the correct editing, but why did I get blocked? This block is unfair! please consider it. Early on, I thought the editing was a simple task, and I thought that i could add just one a text and finish. I added a text to Behzad Leito's page and a few minutes later I've received a block message, that i may be blocked. I did not do any other editing until the next day. And I thought you may correct mistakes of Behzad Leito's page. Since then, I learned how to edit, and so far all my edits have been right and correct with the source.Andrea.bersi (talk) 12:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked at your editing history. I have seen you posting your personal opinions into articles, posting content which clearly contradicts sources, posting nonsense, posting irrelevant content into articles (as for example gratuitously and without explanation putting a twentieth century date in the middle of a sentence in an article about a person who lived in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries), posting content in garbled English, and so on. Much of it may have been good faith editing without understanding what you were doing, but some of it is difficult to see as anything other than deliberate vandalism. However, it really doesn't make any difference whether it was deliberate or not: either way, none of your editing has been constructive, and all you are achieving is wasting time for other editors who have to clean up what you have done. Instructions on how to request an unblock are given in the block messages above: you need to follow those instructions if you are to have any chance of being unblocked. However, I think the chance will be a very remote one. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

in addition, you DID receive many warnings, you DID ignore them, you DID deliberately delete them all, And you DID NOT proceed as instructed. — Smuckola (talk) 22:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]