User talk:Andrew343434

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from an article. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Delirium 23:15, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during February 16 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Kent Township, Stephenson County, Illinois, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Andrew343434 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

70.145.146.188 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

vandal account

Blocking administrator: Luna Santin (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andrew343434 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am sorry for abuseing my power to edit and i wish i can have another chance

Decline reason:

Well if you want a second chance, you can propose major improvements to preexisting articles or write a new one right here, and then re-request unblocking. I need to know you're serious about contributing to our encyclopedia before unblocking you. -- Netsnipe ► 11:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Faking someone's signature to sign an unblock approval notice (which doesn't do anything to begin with) is an offense that results in a permanent ban from Wikipedia. You've lost whatever chances you had left with us. -- Netsnipe ► 03:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]