User talk:Angelbreak

Angelbreak, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Angelbreak! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Troppenkoller moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Troppenkoller, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:22, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's helpful to do this while someone is actively editing the article because it was automatically recreated before I even noticed what you moved it. Moving it to draft space was entirely unnecessary as well. It's "tropical neurasthenia". This is definitely not a neologism. You made a mistake there and I don't think moving the article was the right next step. You haven't explained what you think is wrong with the article. Don't you think you should do that before moving an article someone is working on? Angelbreak (talk) 17:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Angelbreak You should read the warnings messages which had been left on your article - mainspace is not the place to develop drafts, you reverted now 3 times my edits and moved the draft without sufficient explanations back into mainspace which is called Wikipedia:Edit warring and may lead to a block of your account. You further should make yourself comfortable with Wikipedia:NAD. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your making quite the fuss over a moot point, it's quite past the point of being a draft now. Threats and intimidation aside, what exactly in the article is not supported by citations? You added a reference improve tag so instead of bickering why don't we address your concern, if you could state what it is. Angelbreak (talk) 17:55, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that you recently removed content from Troppenkoller without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What did I remove from the article? Angelbreak (talk) 18:35, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]