User talk:Aniket chaudhary12

March 22

It is against policy to remove another user's posts from an article talk page or to replace them with your own. Slatersteven (talk) 10:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

so it is also not ok to remove haryana from the main page , this is serious discrimation Aniket chaudhary12 (talk) 10:33, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No it is not, and you need to now read wp:spa wp:npa an wp:rightgreatwrongs. If you can't obey our policies you will end up getting banned (off and see WP:NOTDUMB cries of "discrimination" will not protect you). Slatersteven (talk) 10:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why some notorious users are deleting haryana from the article and no one is editing the same? Aniket chaudhary12 (talk) 10:40, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because they do not agree the sources are really enough for him to be called a major leader of the rebellion, as they have said on the talk page and in the edit summaries. The leaders we have are the leaders that have been called the leaders of either side in pretty much every source on the topic. We were (and are) trying to reduce the clutter in the infobox by only including those, the ones everyone agrees were major leaders. Slatersteven (talk) 10:46, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

he was the major leader and mentioned in many sources i have also provided few of them Aniket chaudhary12 (talk) 10:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is my last post here, you need to get wp:consensus, and breaking rules or calling users names will not get you it. I have told you if you keep this attitude up you will get a ban. Next time I will make it a formal warning.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

. Slatersteven (talk) 11:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Jaideep thakur per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaideep thakur. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 15:35, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]