User talk:Anitasmalling

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Taser. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Also, please note that your edit might be construed as a legal threat, and those are forbidden by WP Policy. --Nuujinn (talk) 22:33, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proflowers edit

I reverted your last edit at ProFlowers. I am trying not to be too hasty in judgment, but that edit was pretty vandalous. Please don't make unsubstantiated personal attacks on any article. --Descartes1979 (talk) 04:13, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - your personal experiences are not substantiated sources. Wikipedia is not a place for you to air grievances about this company. If you can point to a source about this experience that is independent of you and adheres to WP:RS then we can include it - but continued vandalism will get you blocked pretty damn quick. If you have a beef with ProFlowers, take it to them or the BBB - not the Wikipedia. Take it down a notch. I reverted your edits again.--Descartes1979 (talk) 07:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to ProFlowers, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: ProFlowers was changed by Anitasmalling (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938446 on 2011-01-17T04:54:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:54, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block warning

This is three times in the last few hours that you have tried to valdalize this page over a personal beef with this company. If you do it again, I will report you to the admin notice board and you will be blocked. This is your last warning. --Descartes1979 (talk) 07:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Dude seriously - take a chill pill. Wikipedia is an ENCYCLOPEDIA. Not the Better Business Bureau. Nor is this, or will it ever be, a place for revenge. If you have an independent newspaper article or report about how awful Proflowers is because of your funeral fiasco, then that is great - that is an independent source and we can include that information. Please read WP:RS for guidance. If all you have is your word - sorry but that is not good enough. Raise hell with ProFlowers or the BBB, or the state government for all I care. Don't try to muck up an encyclopedia with such an obviously extremely minor incident. --Descartes1979 (talk) 02:14, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]