User talk:Anittas/ArchiveIII

Alexander for Admin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Alexander_007 ,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#Alexander_007 . I've nominated User:Alexander_007 as admin. Let's vote for him! -- Bonaparte talk & contribs 13:57, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Anittas, I'm not seeking adminship at the moment. Think of somebody else, guys! How about User:AdiJapan? --Alexander 007 14:00, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Lasa ca accepta, numai ii ia putin timp.-- Bonaparte talk & contribs 14:49, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Multumesc! :) o sa invingem :) .-- Bonaparte

Mersi Anittas! -- Bonaparte talk & contribs 17:44, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Romanian notice board

Thanks for putting me in.User:Dpotop

Excuse me?

Sir/madam - you are out of line! - Ta bu shi da yu 14:57, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Read WP:CIVIL. Try to be better than the people you rail against ;) Sam Spade 21:35, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Go to hell. --Anittas 21:39, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm bound for a better place (righteous glory), but thank you for the advice all the same. Sam Spade 21:46, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

moderator

Acum am ajuns si sa moderez pagina istoria belarusului. fac o treaba buna acolo. sa te uiti si tu.-- Bonaparte talk 13:25, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Vot impotriva lui Node

Hei! Fii pe faza! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Moldovan_language#Vote_for_limiting_user.27s_Node_ue_ability_to_edit_the_article_about_Moldovan_language -- Bonaparte talk 19:33, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Embassador

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=8&q=embassador --- Same thing. --Anittas 06:23, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

"Ambassador": 54,900,000 Google hits. "Embassador": 104,000 Google hits. And our own article starts out "An ambassador, rarely embassador…" Trust me, "ambassador" would be the more likely spelling by a contemporary educated native speaker. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:35, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Are you seriously saying that you don't trust me, to know which spellings are common and uncommon in my native language? -- Jmabel | Talk 06:58, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Battle of Vaslui

Hi - thanks for the message. The article is looking pretty good. From the description, it sounds a little like Cannae (centre deliberately giving way and encirclement). Some ideas - it would be nice to have more details on the troops - numbers of cannon and horse, types of arms (swords, spears, etc), what kind of cannon - together with a map of the area of the battle (where the forces started, how they manoeuvred, etc).

It would be a good idea to ask the people at WikiProject Military history what they think, and to go through Wikipedia:Peer review before WP:FAC.

Good luck! -- ALoan (Talk) 16:28, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

User:NazismIsntCool

Anittas, don't be fooled by "Julia Radulescu". I have serious doubts that she is Romanian after having read these edits made by her in April of 2005:[1] and [2]. Alexander 007 13:14, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

There should be a rule against people impersonating a nationality on Wikipedia. Anybody who asks "Are Moldova and Moldavia close together?", yet claims to have immigrated from Romania to America in 1999 (!), is a liar, I'm sorry. Alexander 007 13:36, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

She is also User:RomaniaIsntCool, and after she vandalized Romania's site eventually she got blocked (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RomaniaIsntCool), -- Bonaparte talk 13:59, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Did you check the IP's? Alexander 007 14:01, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

No, she's not Romaniaisntcool. Someone else is. They actually said they would make the nick. Well, she might not be Romanian, but I see no reason to believe that she's an ex nazi. Alex, what makes you think that? --Anittas 17:26, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

To avoid possible defamation, I erased my "she may be an ex-Neo Nazi" suspicion. I did not charge that she is an ex-Neo Nazi, just that I suspect she may be or may have hung out a lot with them, because her behavior reminds me of a chick who used to date gangsters and now wears a t-shirt around town that says "Gangters are not cool". Alexander 007 17:29, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Anyway, you don't care about this topic, but for those who do, I direct them to User talk:NazismIsntCool#D.C. meetup (which shows the decidedly strange way she used to color her sig--- Nazis|misn|tcool---with the middle color in dull yellow, so that what stood out at a casual glance was Nazis...tcool. This was remarked upon here:User talk:NazismIsntCool#Indeed Nazism is far from cool but your name reads like it is. Lying about one thing, who knows what else they lie about. Alexander 007 19:19, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

She already explained that she used the colours of the Ro flag. Anyway, I don't agree with your latest message on her talkpage. I think it was stupid! What do you mean it incites? Incites who? Nazis? So f:.ucdfking what? --Anittas 19:21, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, yeah, she's full of ****. She didn't explain why she divided it the way she did. I recommend a change in User Name, and so does User:Jimbo Wales. She's trolling. Alexander 007 19:23, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

She did explain the usage of the colours! Jimbo recommended a nick change, but he didn't order her to. And you are speculating on everything. You got no proof of anything. Let her be. Her nickname has nothing to do with her not being Ro. --Anittas 19:26, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

She didn't explain why she divided it like this: Nazis|misn|tcool, instead of as one may expect: Nazism|Isnt|cool. Alexander 007 19:30, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Your entire case is built on speculation. --Anittas 19:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

What case? My case is that her User Name should be changed. Everything else doesn't involve Wikipedia. Alexander 007 19:37, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Your case about she using colours the wrong way or that she incited Nazis. That's BS. She should not change her nickname. In fact, perhaps I'll change my nick to a similar nickname. What's with you, dude? Are you turning into a Wiki bureaucrat? --Anittas 19:41, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Stephen the Great

You said: (moving another honorific version of his name; more appropriate to mention here than at Republic of Moldova)

Why would it be appropriate at all, to mention this in the Republic of Moldova article? What does one thing have to do with another? --Anittas 05:15, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

I don't understand your question. I removed it from Republic of Moldova because it was not appropriate there, but noticed that it was missing from the Stephen III of Moldavia article, where it was appropriate. Are you saying that Stephen should not be mentioned by any name at Republic of Moldova? My understanding is that he is something of an iconic national hero there. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:36, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

I moved the longer version of his honorific, with şi Sfânt. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:48, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Yes Joe! In this way is correct! -- Bonaparte talk 22:27, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Anti-semitism

In case you are not aware of it, this edit of yours reads, to me, as anti-Semitic. In fact, try as I might, I can't construe it any other way. I suggest that you strike through it, and apologize to the person at whom it was directed. And if I see you make a similar edit again, whether about Jews or any other ethnicity, regardless of whom it is addressed to, be assured that I will start an RfC, and that my goal in doing so will be to get you banned from Wikipedia for as long a time as possible.

Almost no amount of good conduct can make up for something like this in my eyes. And if you want to consider my remarks here a personal attack, fine, we can have our RfC now. -- Jmabel | Talk 00:31, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

He clearly state: DEATH TO ALL NAZI! on his user page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anittas , such a person cannot and is not anti-semitic. -- Bonaparte talk 10:23, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

There was no anti-semetism involved. I'm not anti-semetic. He is a Jew, not a Moldovan. --Anittas 00:53, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

: I did not say that you are, in general, anti-Semitic. I said that the remark is. : I have opened an RfC. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Anittas. Obviously, it will not proceed further until someone else signs on to it. I sincerely hope that you will listen to the next person who asks you to retract and apologize, and the matter will be done with. : You said on WP:AN/I that I "threaten[ed] to have me banned for as long as possible. I suggest you re-read the remark above. That threat was conditional: "if I see you make a similar edit again". It was not a threat over the one edit. -- Jmabel | Talk 01:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

hello Anittas

Could you please explain to me your phrase "Feel free to make your stand on this RfA." Thanks. (note: my english aren't advanced and I'm not sure I understand what you mean) +MATIA ☎ 00:41, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Anittas

My advice: Apologize for the comment. It was bad. You just keep justifying it. Yes, a Jewish Moldovan is different from a non-Jewish Moldovan, but a Jewish Moldovan is still a Moldovan if he identifies himself as such. This is not as relevant to User:Node ue however, who probably was born in the states. Alexander 007 07:45, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Don't you get it? I will not apologize. I have the right to say that. If people want to interpret it in different ways, then that's up to them. --Anittas 09:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

I don't necessarily advise to apologize to Node, but you should probably apologize for the perceived anti-Semitism, or for a comment that was ambiguous. Alexander 007 09:48, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Hello Anittas. Although your recent comments may not have been intended to cause offense, they clearly have done so. As a sign of good faith, I strongly urge you to post a note of retraction/explanation in order to put this behind us. If you did not mean to cause any offense, it truly is not worth going through an RfC and it is much better to remain in good standing with the community. Your refusal to retract or to respond to those whose feelings you have hurt would invariably affect your dealings with other Wikipedians in the future. Ramallite ^(talk) 13:52, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

But I have explained myself, in detail, on the RfC page. I already explained what I meant and that it wasn't meant to sound anti-Semetic. --Anittas 13:55, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Yes, and you have convinced some editors involved that your remarks were not meant to be anti semitic. But you were defending your comment without taking into account the hurt feelings it caused. Would you be able to address that? Ramallite ^(talk) 14:13, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm convinced it was not meant to be anti-Semitic because it was directed at Node, and because I see no other indication of anti-Semitism in Anittas. But that last touch that he added, "A Jewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!" is hard to ignore (though I'm pretty sure Anittas was just f**** around). If only for that, Anittas should release a general apology. What's the big deal? What's it gonna cost you? You don't have to address your apology to Node. Alexander 007 14:50, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for The Back UP

Thanks for the backup. It is much appreciated. What is this RFC?

User: bumpusmills1 13 December 2005 08:16 AM Central Time

Link Received

Again, thanks.

User: bumpusmills1 13 December 2005

Bumpus

If anyone wishes to start an RfC over Bumpus' vitriolic remarks, I will gladly sign on. I just started one yesterday for the first time in my two years on Wikipedia. I am not going to start another one today. And, let me be clear, I started an RfC against you, Anittas, only because you would not take the middle ground allowed by my message to you. You could have ignored me and desisted from the behavior, and the matter would have ended there. But you told me to start an RfC. -- Jmabel | Talk 18:07, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

         All you will accomplish is fueling the fire burning inside of me.  I 
         will not retract or apologize for what I've said.  If my comments 
         wound your feelings that tells me you are a right-winger and not 
         worthy of my respect whatsoever.

         --Bumpusmills1 02:21, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

---

Just trying to clear up some things, Junior.

--Bumpusmills1 02:21, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

RfC

Could I ask you to please have a look at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Anittas#Further_comments_by_Jmabel? Thanks. -- Jmabel | Talk 19:05, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Orioane's RfA

Hey Anittas/ArchiveIII! Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. To my amazement there were no negative or neutral votes and the result was (28/0/0). I am now an administrator so I'll try and do my best in this new position. I'll be happy to answer any comments or requests from you. Mersi mult încă odată, şi "Crăciun fericit" şi "La Mulţi Ani!" (eu intru în Wikivacanţă :D) Mihai -^talk 20:41, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Edit

Hello King Anittas! What's your opinion on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Moldova#.C5.9Etefan_cel_Mare should we add also "Sfânt" or not? Feel free to edit if you decided in a way or another. Cresti mare ;)

Bonaparte talk 21:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Your message

Taken from my talk page:

WTF are you talking about, Hollow? --Anittas 23:51, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Winnermario is evidently upset with certain Wikipedians for the actions they have inflicted upon her throughout her presence on this website. The message that she left me was perplexing, however I knew she was releasing her fury in a down-to-earth method due to her complimenting me on elevating articles Hollaback Girl and The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask to substantial quality. By the way, would you like to readd me to your MSN list? I don't quite understand why you originally removed me. Did it have something to do with me becoming Winnermario's successor? She donated her account to me, I know it sounds unusual. —Hollow Wilerding 23:56, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

If you view Mariah's profile page, you will understand that she will seldom log on to Wikipedia. Due to this matter, she has entrusted me with her MSN account — permanently. Should she subsequently return to internet socializing, she will register her name under a new account. I quote Mariah: "Times have been difficult since I began blogging with the Wikipedians. Sometimes I found myself in danger, while other times I felt useless. It was time consuming. Now I'm only going to log on to Wikipedia occasionally. That settles the matter now. I wish [the Wikipedians] could try to see what I'm getting at [Courtni]." End quote. —Hollow Wilerding 00:22, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

It is williambalogh@hotmail.com. The e-mail is apparently named after Mariah's cousin. —Hollow Wilerding 00:35, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

belarus

Belarus implies link with Rus, not with Russia. Kievan Rus is the common ancestor of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine. After Mongol invasion of Russia Belarus and Ukraine appeared under Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, while Muscovy under Mongols. After Mongols were defeated, Muscovy tried to fight other lands back with varying success. Eventually Poland was partitioned and Belarus lands were annexed to Russian Empire. During Polish Rule Belarussian nobility was undergone thorough Polonization. In Russia in was Russification. After Russian Revolution & civl war Belarus was split 50-50 with Poland. In Soviet Union initially it was revival and reconstruction of Belarusian language and culture (for about 15 years). In Poland belarussians were "bydlo" and "psia krew" ("cattle" and "dog's blood") and Belarussian lands were given to about 30,000 osadniks, Polish veterans settled. Since 1935 Soviet Belarussian intelligentsia was heavily decimated in Soviet Union. In 1939 Poland was again split between Nazi and Soviets. More "belarusian nationalists" landed in gulag. As a result of all these developments belarussian language was used in real life mostly in villages. Once a person moves to a city, his Belarussian speech (often mixed trasianka) was "cultureless", "rural", while Russian language was "cultural", "civilized" . mikka (t) 02:07, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Yes, Ukrainian is quite similar to Russian, just like the Romance languages are quite similar and to an extent mutually intelligible. But I don't think it can be argued that they are the same language, since they're not fully mutually intelligible and have structural differences. Belarusian is actually more similar to Russian, to the point where it could perhaps be considered a dialect, in the same way that Aromanian is considered a dialect of Romanian, but they are sufficiently different, both in heritage and linguistics, to place them as two separate languages. It's true, though, that there has been quite a lot of dislike between Russians and other East Slavic people, but that's because of Russian policy in the Soviet Union, which sought to assimilate the distinct Ukrainian and Belarusian cultures. Lukashenko is still very pro-Russian, and wants economic union, but nowadays Russia isn't so keen on this union. Ronline ✉ 23:28, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Response

Hi Anittas,

I'd say the middle one in the second row.

Oh and, which one do you like most here? I'd go with the one on the far left. What about you? --Node 00:12, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Great

I was googling on Anittas, in order to find more info on Anittas (the Hittie King), and then saw the second result: your RfC on me. That's just bloody great. If someone googles my name and finds that RfC, they will think that I hate Jews, or something. I use this nickname in other places, too. WTF, dude! What have you done? Can't you edit that RfC and add a HUGE disclaimer on top of it, saying that your acussations against me were false and that you retract them all? I did what you wanted and stroke through the text on my talk page. Please return the favour. --Anittas 00:07, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Try googling my name and one of the first hits you will get is some BBS out of Iaşi in which you will see someone claiming that as a Jew and and American, I cannot possibly have any comprehension of a complex European culture like Romania. Welcome to the Internet, it's not always a pleasant neighborhood.

I will put disclaimer on the page. It may not be exactly the isclaimer you want, but it will be what I can honestly say. -- Jmabel | Talk 00:23, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

anon

Ha. Ha --203.54.74.59 (from yesterday)

Moldova

Hi Anittas. I don't agree with your changes at Republic of Moldova regarding Eminescu. Sure, he was Romanian, but he was also Moldavian, and is thus also claimed by Moldova, which sees itself, along with Romania, as the successor of the Moldavian Principality. Combine this with common language and culture, and many Moldovans regard what is Romania to also be part of their culture (after all, Moldovans are the same ethnicity as Romanians). Now, onto the broader issue - you must understand that not everyone is a Moldovan unionist, and that while culturally and ethnically, Moldovans are "Romanians", they are a separate state, and therefore, in the political sense, they do have self-determination. For that reason, Romanian hegemonism over Moldova is not justified in the same way that German hegemonism isn't justified over Austria. Ronline ✉ 11:43, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

Izehar's RfA

Hi Anittas,

I would like to thank you for your kind support on my RfA. I'll do my best to be a good administrator. If you need anything or if I ever do something I shouldn't have, please, don't hesitate to drop me a line. Izehar 16:45, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

don't worry

Don't worry buddy ;) Bonaparte talk 12:42, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

I worry every time you post. Do not involve yourself in that conflict. Please! --Anittas 12:45, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Just watching you winning! All'ght, King Anittas

Bonaparte talk 12:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC)