Jump to content

User talk:Anne.rooney

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re: pic removed

[edit]

Hi, you may want to ask that question at Wikipedia:Media Copyright Questions. They will help to make sure you upload the picture with the appropriate copyright tag. —Pilotguy (ptt) 14:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Anne.rooney! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 698 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Andrew Coburn (catastrophe modeller) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ACinTiara.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ACinTiara.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:43, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew Coburn (catastrophe modeller) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Coburn (catastrophe modeller) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Coburn (catastrophe modeller) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. agtx 22:35, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:SadApostrophe, from its old location at User:Anne.rooney/SadApostrophe. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. North America1000 06:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:SadApostrophe, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:SadApostrophe

[edit]

Hello, Anne.rooney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SadApostrophe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 05:48, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]