User talk:Anniebisilolo

Kaptain Kush moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kaptain Kush, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 14:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello Anniebisilolo. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Kaptain Kush, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Anniebisilolo. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Anniebisilolo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Celestina007 (talk) 14:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In no manner or way was I compensated to make any edits here and also, I would love you to put me through on how to submit an article to avoid any future penalty, if there's a page i can read about it, kindly send it. Thanks also for the correction because I discovered I added some sources which were not accepted too. Anniebisilolo (talk) 14:43, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:Zinoleesky, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Anniebisilolo, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Anniebisilolo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Celestina007 (talk) 14:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also concerning Draft:Zinoleesky, I started the page and moved it to draft when I discovered I left things untidy and I'm still very much working on it. Anniebisilolo (talk) 14:47, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaptain Kush (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaptain Kush and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kaptain Kush, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 16:36, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue editing the article, please what the article needs? enough reliable source right?

I will continue editing the article, please what the article needs? enough reliable source right? Anniebisilolo (talk) 16:29, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rexxie moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rexxie, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 14:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please what's the mininum number of reliable source needed for the article to be termed qualified for wikipedia article? Anniebisilolo (talk) 14:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps Avoid Article Creation For Now

I think you might benefit from starting from minor editing before proceeding to article creation. All your article creations thus far have been very much below standard. The most recent being Cubana Chief Priest, I would have moved it to draft & asked for you to use the WP:AFC process to submit it but to be honest, that would be an effort in futility as no decent AFC reviewer would accept that article. Generally speaking, before one proceeds to article creation a prerequisite must be that they understand WP:GNG thoroughly, understanding GNG is a must which clearly you do not understand. A common misconception people make is to presume popularity & notability are synonymous, whilst in actuality they aren’t. The essence of Wikipedia is to build an encyclopedia and not to retain biographical articles on just anyone. The Cubana Chief Priest article is not an encyclopedic one and reads like a gossip piece. The sourcing is very much underwhelming, you used Linda Ikeji’s Blog, Gistmania & a host of other unreliable sources which is in direct contradiction of Reliable sources . All these brings me back to why I am asking you to refrain from article creation & concentrate on other less tasking aspects of the project. Celestina007 (talk) 10:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted. Anniebisilolo (talk) 10:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the excessive refs used throughout the article to the best of my ability. Just so you know it’s never about the number of the sources but the quality of the sources used. Celestina007 (talk) 11:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve seen it and I’ve learnt from it. Anniebisilolo (talk) 11:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please how long should it take before I start creating page again here? Thanks in anticipation. Anniebisilolo (talk) 11:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As soon as you feel you understand WP:GNG well enough you may continue creating articles as you deem fit. There’s no specific time frame it all depends on you. Celestina007 (talk) 16:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, Thanks alot. Anniebisilolo (talk) 17:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. DGG ( talk ) 01:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted! Anniebisilolo (talk) 06:14, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can the page be drafted so that I can correct every errors on it? Anniebisilolo (talk) 06:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Kolapoimam per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kolapoimam. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly look into the block, there might have been a mistake Anniebisilolo (talk) 21:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fresh VDM (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only one reference is a non-interview secondary source that has any significant coverage, most of the rest are either track release or signing announcements. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fresh VDM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fresh VDM, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 22:48, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]