Jump to content

User talk:Anonbirdie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2017

[edit]

(inaccurate information) Magnolia677 (talk) 00:28, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Wikipedia is aware of my IP address and that I edited that before I joined. Also I was the anonymous IP, I then created a wiki to get updated because of people like you who hate upcoming artists who put in work. This artist collaborated with artists from the Rock n Roll hall of fame unlike all the other artists cited. I CITED MY SOURCES. I am not the artist I am an avid fan of miami music and I know my history, which I will go and edit again because pitbull started trap music. I am a female named Jasmine and I have no affiliation with these artist. I follow Miami Bass Music which is the core of Trap music and I know very well that PITBULL STARTED LATIN TRAP, he didn't label the subgenre but he was part of latin trap including a ton of other latino artists from the 80s. Then Traumatize another CUBAN rapper began to infuse spanish with rap and influenced, La Goony Chonga, Jerry nicaro, don krez... all the information I cited was correct. The songs are proof that he made latin trap before they did. Not only that but do you even live in an area that originated Bass music which evolved rap forever??

Stop editing I'm giving credit to artists that deserve it. I will keep editing it because I am a real follower of Latin Trap and what is written there is inaccurate. Just because some paid writer wrote about them doesn't mean they originated it. I don't understand with the agenda against underground artists. They do all the real work.

-A real fan

You can add whatever musicians you want to Wikipedia, so long as you follow the rules that have been agreed to at Wikipedia:Notability (people) and WP:MUSICBIO. If the musician is not notable, and you are only adding them to Wikipedia to enhance their notability, this will not be permitted. Please see WP:E=N and WP:SOUNDCLOUDBAND for more detail. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:15, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


It is notable wth, this is HISTORY. With production with a super producer, hip hop hall of fame artists and also influence in the underground that is evident. You are cultest certified hater. Notable? Half of the names on there aren't even registered on wikipedia.. Traumatize has set up shows in the background with the likes of 36mafia and bone thugz countless time. You are not part of hip hop culture therefore you do not understand the gravity of what you are doing. He was on the Miami new times countless times for his performances.. Latinos in miami don't get respect but I'm out there in the hip hop shows with IMMORTAL TECHNIQUE WHO SHOULD BE MENTIONED AS WELL. If you are defending your article it is inaccurate with recently notarized artists that don't have credentials. I am here to put the ACCURATE information.


oh and by the way I read those terms you linked me to and this was there "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded .... it isn't interesting that this artist did all of this in the miami underground being from foreign background? It is extremely interesting and influential... especially since he got hate when he was doing this latin trap before the people cited. All the stuff cited is boring except for the paragraph I wrote..... MIAMI BASS MAN WATCH THE FREAKING DOCUMENTERY HE WORKED WITH HUGO DIAZ! I know you don't know who that is but that is a legendary latin producer, who produced half of pitbulls album and "get low". HAve you ever heard of DJ LAZ? Get in your lane man you are just hating.


Cardi B doesn't even rap in spanish.... or use an 808 drumbass


Content dispute

[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Talk:Trap music#Latin trap - content dispute regarding a content dispute you are involved in. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:34, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration

[edit]

Regarding the comment you left on my userpage (which was deleted because you should use talk pages for communicating with other users): Wikipedia is a collaborative process. That means editors, often with differing points of view, will work together to create articles. There needs to be consensus, usually obtained on that article's talk page, in order to keep the process working. If you don't agree with someone, talk about it. But simply reverting each other's edits (known as an edit war) is unproductive and regulated. Take some time to explore your options to include information that others may not agree with. Cheers. Ifnord (talk) 15:12, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:00, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Anonbirdie, I realize that things aren't going your way here, and that you are frustrated. As noted above, while it is true that Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anyone can edit, it is not the encyclopedia that anyone can edit in any way they chose. This is a collaborative project, which means we work with other editors. You can't call people names when they don't agree with you. We also have policies, the most important for you are reliable sources and verifiability. Please try to familiarize yourself with them before attempting to re-add your edits, in which you are in a content dispute with several highly-regarded editors. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:07, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anonbirdie (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am being blatantly harassed here. I cited my sources, if everytime someone didn't like accurate put on wikipedia then we wouldn't have a wikipedia. I feel that the reasons for removing the information are invalid. I abided by wikipedia rules, Magnolia677 escalated the problem harassed me then proceeded to report me for harassment when all I have been doing is adding accurate information. Other works here cite wikipedia, I made the effort to cite outside sources with proof. Magazines aren't the only reputable sources, regular people write articles. This person didn't even want to come to an agreement they are just completely erasing everything I wrote without even acknowledging that the information is interesting and accurate. I didn't know wikipedia was made for people to selectively put information. Magnolia677 should be blocked as well for harassing me. I feel personally targeted by that user. They have been harassing me for 2 weeks already. Without valid reason except they themselves carry the opinion that the information isn't notable when the artists I listed are more notable then the entire section in the sub genre, since they are pioneers of the music. Not only that but the information now on the "Latin Trap" section is inaccurate. Latin Trap started in Miami. Miami Bass originated the sound of trap and Atlanta continued it. It bounced back to Miami with Artist Pitbull and producer Hugo Diaz. There is an entire documentary on it, I know my history. People who have no done accurate research are editing it for their own self pleasure which is completely wrong. Everyone is ganging up on me and I feel targeted, harassed and now enlightened about the type of people who are here on wikipedia.

Decline reason:

You said, "you guys are nazis." You have not addressed this in your unblock request. You are blocked under WP:NPA and it certainly looks to me like you did indeed write that. Yamla (talk) 18:36, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.