Hello, Another avatar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! .--TownDownHow's going? 12:17, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks , but i will not write for you people anymore, since some of my edits were reverted.Another avatar (talk) 12:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
When you write something in Wikipedia, sometimes many users reverted you because there is not references about you wrote, but they shouldn't revert you just because they want, but they can add a template for references required, the reversion is more used to vandal editions like blank information or to write crazy things like "fewfdsfd". regards. --TownDownHow's going? 13:04, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh well, I had to correct some disambiguation pages which in my humble opinion were a mess. But now it is up to you peopleAnother avatar (talk) 15:38, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In case you get over your attitude, you should know you will always be reverted when you place disambiguation pages into Category:Disambiguation. That Cat, as described on its page is for a very special group of pages (14 in number, at present). Dab pages are put into another, appropriate Cat, when you insert {{Disambig}}. --Jerzy•t 03:00, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This edit (30 July) was not "to correct some disambiguation pages". Instead, it represents the introduction of Indigenous Aryans fringecruft. -- Fullstop (talk) 16:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
in your opinion, maybe. nowhere will find some statement about indigenousnousAnother avatar (talk) 08:13, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Boleyn (talk) 10:08, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Thank you. I have struck thru your gratuitous and uncivil remark, and also deactivated your retaliatory and unjustified warning to Boleyn, who understands, respects, and has not violated, the policy. --Jerzy•t 19:22, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You were warned, verbally expressed defiance, and promptly made (unless i miscounted slightly) your fifth assertion of similar material in 3 hours, and your seventh in less than 24. While any block of an account or IP address belonging to you is in effect, it is a violation of WP policy for you to edit WP using any other acct or IP; in your case, an investigation is underway to identify your sockpuppets. --Jerzy•t 19:22, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Go f* yourself silly boy. I created the page for your wisdom. Stay stupid. Another avatar (talk) 10:36, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As you can see by the usenmane , i have edited under various names over the years with 1000's of edits, but now i am getting sick from you people. The persons who attack my edits get a free hand while i am blocked. I am putting my efforts with Jim Wales' rivals now, retards. Another avatar (talk) 11:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Altering the content added and signed by another user is forgery, a serious matter that demands a bright-line definition, rather than an irony exception. That said, irony was pretty obvious, producing the least of forgeries, so your block extension is correspondingly moderated.
This is your last warning. You must use this talk page in a constructive, civil manner, instead of disrupting. If you make any more unconstructive edits to this talk page, the page will be temporarily protected, and you would be unable to communicate with others.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Boleyn (talk) 10:08, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You must use this talk page in a constructive, civil manner, instead of disrupting. If you make any more unconstructive edits to this talk page, the page will be temporarily protected, and you would be unable to communicate with others. 