User talk:AntaBel

This is AntaBel's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, AntaBel!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:48, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oliver Johnstone (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CanonNi were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see H:REFB and convert the external links to proper references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oliver Johnstone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 08:42, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AntaBel! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 08:42, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Oliver Johnstone has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oliver Johnstone. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:45, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the say. IMDB is not allowed as a reference, but it is allowed in a section "External links". The reason is that it is a site with solely user generated content, so is not reliable 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:49, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! AntaBel (talk) 10:58, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review history

This is part of the history of the draft, and is used by future reviewers. Please do not remove it. By doing so you also removed your ability to resubmit for further review. I have put it back for you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:43, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I didn't know I had removed it! AntaBel (talk) 12:48, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We try to help new editors 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:15, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than review the current version formally I'm going to give you a "private review", which will give you the chance to make improvements if possible while waiting for a formal review. It's kinder, too, because I would need to decline it and ask for more work.

As presented, you have not shown Johnstone to pass WP:NACTOR. At present we see him as a decent jobbing actor, but not yet a notable actor. Adding more roles won't show it, because you need to show The person has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. I see playing Henry V at the Globe as one of these, but I cannot see others. This may mean that we are too early in his career.

I expect the next reviewer will decline based upon a similar rationale 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again thank you for your feedback!

I understand that it may be too early in his career. I have not include all of his television roles and he has also played lead roles with the Royal Shakespeare Company, and was called "a major find" by the reviewer in the UK's Telegraph newspaper. But perhaps even the inclusion of this would not be sufficient at this moment? I can have to wait for his next big role to try again. AntaBel (talk) 16:29, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oliver Johnstone (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tumbuka Arch was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most sources are just passing mentions. Notability is not inherited, thus being a son of a well know Mr Doe does not mean Junior Doe needs a standalone article. Instead, look for sources that strictly talk about the subject themselves that are independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oliver Johnstone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tumbuka Arch (talk) 18:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]