User talk:Antoine kornprobst

Reply

Thank you for your message on my talk page. It was not just the inclusion of the linked in links that was inappropriate. The wikipedia guidelines say that only students who are themselves notable enough for a wikipedia article should be included in the infobox - see Template:Infobox academic - so I have again removed the names as none of them meet this criteria. Please do not add them again. Melcous (talk) 15:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Raphael Douady. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 15:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Raphael Douady.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 15:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I refer you again to Template:infobox academic which clearly says "doctoral_students Only those notable enough for WP articles. Should be explained in the main text of the article; Those that are not mentioned in the main text may be deleted." Please also read WP:3RR - reverting content more than 3 times within 24 hours I can lead to an immediate block from editing wikipedia. You have already broken this by reverting four times. If you do it again, I will report you. Melcous (talk) 15:31, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Antoine kornprobst. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Raphael Douady, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 15:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Raphael Douady. 331dot (talk) 15:30, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Antoine_kornprobst reported by User:331dot (Result: ). Thank you. 331dot (talk) 15:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Raphael Douady. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:21, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh don't worry, I will never ever come back on this site if that's how you treat me... too bad for you !Antoine kornprobst (talk) 17:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No one has asked you to never come back, and such a view is an overreaction. There are, however, certain processes to go through to resolve disputes, which do not include edit warring. You are free to visit the talk page of the article to explain your concerns and respond to what you have already been told as to the reason why your edits were reverted. 331dot (talk) 01:51, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would also urge you to review conflict of interest since you seem to be attempting to add yourself to the article. 331dot (talk) 01:53, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Antoine kornprobst, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

331dot (talk) 14:45, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you no longer wish to receive email from Wikipedia, you can remove your email address from your preferences. Accounts cannot be removed. If you don't wish to use it, simply stop. 331dot (talk) 15:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info, I'll remove my email. I did stop using my Wikipedia account and never visited again since last time... however there are other students who are idiots and keep making edits to Raphael's page... I'm not responsible for that !! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.140.105.123 (talk) 15:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There, I changed my password to a random 15 chars one that I never saw and removed my email so I have no way to recover it, hopefully I won't hear from Wikipedia ever again ! Thanks 331dot for the info, that was actually helpful in getting rid of my account for good. Antoine Kornprobst — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.140.105.123 (talk) 18:06, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]