User talk:AntonChigurhs gun

July 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Merchant of Venice, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Artoasis (talk) 00:10, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did not appear constructive? To whom? People who are too buried in myth and fantasy to understand that Shakspere from Stratford was a provincial businessman who could barely write his name, let alone 37 great plays? It's time we ended this nonsense and wrote about the truth. Shakspere didn't write Shakespeare. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AntonChigurhs_gun (talk • contribs)

The article on William Shakespeare is the place to address issues about who actually wrote Shakespeare. For the purpose of the article on The Merchant of Venice, it's sufficient to just say that William Shakespeare wrote it (whoever "Shakespeare" may be). —C.Fred (talk) 03:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Merchant of Venice. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Artoasis (talk) 03:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The reliable source demand is meaningless because the people who propagate the "Shakespeare" myth are the gatekeepers who decide what sources are reliable. We will never make any progress here if we're stuck this meaningless loop.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 21:25, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

People who can't stand the truth "block" people who disagree with them. This is a form of censorship and it's disgraceful.

It is not censorship to block people who refuse to follow Wikipedia policies. If you want to be unblocked, you at least need to demonstrate that you understand and are willing to abide by the policies WP:No original research and WP:Reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 17:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]