User talk:Arjunchaturvedi2005

July 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Akshay Kumar has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Rummskartoffel (talk) 10:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading edit summaries

Please stop making misleading editing summaries. You are putting all your edit summaries as "Fixed typo" which is blatant incorrect in 90% of your edits. This is extremely misleading. Canterbury Tail talk 17:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I shall be careful next time. ease unblock me. Arjunchaturvedi2005 (talk) 15:57, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copright violations

Your addition to Airbus A380 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Canterbury Tail talk 17:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arjunchaturvedi2005 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:06, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I might have negligently selected the incorrect option about my editing type after editing a document as I was new to Wikipedia. I shall be careful next time. Please unblock me. Arjunchaturvedi2005 (talk) 16:02, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had negligently selected incorrect reasons for my editing in articles and hence I had been blocked. I understand my mistake and I shall ensure that this mistake does not occur again. Arjunchaturvedi2005 (talk) 11:12, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]