User talk:Artinpl

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Artinpl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was testing and not decided for the user name, never vandalizing here, and blocked permanently after 1 doubtful edition

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, use UTRS to appeal this. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Artinpl (talk) 00:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Artinpl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17340 was submitted on Jan 19, 2017 12:49:48. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:49, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have engaged in sock puppetry, which means that you have used multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please only use one account on Wikipedia. Using multiple accounts on the same article is sockpuppetry, and will lead to the accounts being blocked from editing. Just Chilling (talk) 23:52, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

I have unblocked you and reversed blocks with User:Srtyhurth. Please note the warning above. Happy editing! Just Chilling (talk) 23:52, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Artinpl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Just Chilling (talk) 23:52, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

4 March 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at National Museum, Warsaw.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Poeticbent talk 16:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:37, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Artinpl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Artinpl is individual, non commercial and not sponsored by anyone, educational project to share knowledge about works of art nowadays and in the past in Poland. I did not checked whether it is inappropriate, because did not saw anything inappropriate. I also do not see anything that could be considered as abusive here and consider this blockage as stupid application of a stupid rule. Artinpl (talk) 18:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you think our rules are stupid, then Wikipedia is probably not the right place for you.

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Optimist on the run (talk) 21:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll leave this open for another admin to review, but for the record, per WP:ORGNAME, names that represent a group of any kind are not permitted. What the organization is is not relevant. I would note that if you actually read the block notice it makes it clear you are perfectly free to just choose a new username that does not represent a group and return to editing at any time. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:46, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well, with such attitude soon wikipedia will be edited only by administrators :) Artinpl (talk) 21:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you aren't getting this, but you could be editing it right now if you just pick a new username and start using it. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:54, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]