User talk:ArturTirulipo

Speedy deletion nomination of Náufrago

Hello ArturTirulipo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Náufrago for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. jBot-42 22:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Náufrago

Hello ArturTirulipo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Náufrago for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. jBot-42 22:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Sophia Abrahão Studio Faya.png

Thanks for uploading File:Sophia Abrahão Studio Faya.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Your addition to Sophia Abrahão has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Book summary copied from http://www.carolinamunhoz.com/blog/english/ Whpq (talk) 19:11, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of sockpuppet investigation

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArthurRebelnatico. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 20:35, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting

I have reverted your edit again. It contains copyright violations which is strictly against Wikipedia policy. Do not addd this material back again. -- Whpq (talk) 22:46, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of ArthurRebelnatico (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]