User talk:Asahback

May 2017

Hello, I'm Altamel. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Business process outsourcing to India have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Altamel (talk) 20:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Dead link replacement

Hi Asahback. I have reverted several of your edits because they added links to commercial websites. Those edits broke two rules: (1) a webpage used as a citation must actually support the Wikipedia article text it is being used as a reference for, and (2) links to websites that exist primarily to sell a good or service may be viewed as spam. Some of your dead link replacements are okay, because they link to useful resources. But others, like your repeated addition of aistechnolabs.com, have no relevance to the article at hand, and should not have been added. Adding links in order to promote a business is a common behavior of individuals editing with a conflict of interest, and comes under heavy scrutiny from the Wikipedia community. For now, I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that the links to commercial websites were added accidentally. However, if you are being paid to edit Wikipedia, you must declare who is paying you, who the client is, and any other relevant role or relationship.

If you are not being paid to edit this website, then welcome to Wikipedia, but please be careful to follow the external links policy. If you have any questions, you may ask on this talk page. Altamel (talk) 20:37, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

I am noticing that this issue is still a problem nearly a week later. EricEnfermero (Talk) 07:01, 2 June 2017 (UTC)