User talk:Asheshong

Hi Ashehong,

1) I am not experimenting, I am writing some facts which the Agoda Customer Service Officer had responsed and it is factual.

2) You thought it is not constructive, that is your view, I respect that. You can remove portion if you think is not factual but should not remove all as what I mentioned are some facts about the Agoda Company.

3) "This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (March 2014)"

As stated at the top of the page, I input some facts to improve the page. Wikipedia is not a platform to market Agoda so why are you removing all the unpleasant facts? I don't see why I am not allow to input some facts which are happening and had happened.

Please clarify my doubts. Thanks

Regards, Boon Chong

Hi,

I had amended some portion of Agoda.com (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agoda.com). I had raised question on the Verifiability of Ref 1 & 2 in your original post under the talk page and removed a portion "Agoda.com, reported to be one of Asia’s largest and most popular accommodation booking sites"

Boonchong chua (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 00:37, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Further editing of Agoda.com wiki

Hi,

I had make some further editing of the page due to some unverified sentence. Boonchong chua (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 12:47, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Ref in Agoda.com

Hi,

I had removed a ref and sentence as the ref do not verify/justify the sentence.

Boonchong chua (talk) 12:54, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

10 Oct

I had talk to one of the admin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:NeilN#Valid_changes_to_agoda.com) regarding this issue.

Please make changes to "Agoda.com is reported to be one of Asia’s largest and most popular accommodation booking sites" back to "one of the leading sites for Asia" (2013) or rephrase but still retains the original meaning.

Boonchong chua (talk) 02:28, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No. of employee by agoda.com

Hi, according to Agoda.com (http://www.agoda.com/en-sg/info/about-agoda.html?asq=jGXBHFvRg5Z51Emf%2fbXG4w%3d%3d&cid=1651633&tag=d317fa4f-2ff3-4dee-9dcb-c69007f39be4), Agoda.com employs more than 1,300 travel professionals.

However, in the wikipedia, you had written "As of 2015, the company has over 2,000 employees worldwide" which does not tally, do you want to revise or you want me to made the amendments?

Boonchong chua (talk) 00:43, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong revert of correct information

You had reverted the correct number of employee back to 2000 which is incorrect according to your own ref.

Boonchong chua (talk) 11:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is Agoda.com one of the largest travel sites in the world?

Please check under the talk page for mt doubts on the validity of the sentence

Boonchong chua (talk) 01:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

pls read

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Agoda.com

23 Jan on query of "one of the most popular"

Pls read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Agoda.com#Defintion_of_.22one_of_the_most_popular.22

Nomination of Agoda.com for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agoda.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agoda.com (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]