User talk:Aurous One

Vertebrate Evolution

Thanks for adopting an orphan! Bob the WikipediaN ^{(talk • contribs)} 04:07, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Giant Armadillo

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia:GLAM/ARKive - keep up the good work! Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 08:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dizocilpine

I have removed this section, until it is investigated. Ref not available, but the doses in the article are about are 10 times higher, than doses which eat holes in the brain of rats according to other sources. They were likely talking about micrograms(!), not milligrams, and this got messed up in the citation. Has to be investigated. We don't want somebody to be found dead after replicating such experiments on himself. So please have this removed until clarification. It is dangerous. 70.137.156.196 (talk) 02:47, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks man

Was dreading that drudgery. My eyes have a hard time with wiki and cites are the worst. You are a hero!TCO (reviews needed) 01:33, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citing ARKive

I have looked at several of the articles where you have transcribed some information from ARKive to the Wiki. I think that you are sourcing the material incorrectly. You have been writing the sources as if you had read the original articles and were sourcing the original articles, when you were actually sourcing from ARKive. Please make the necessary amendments. The guidelines on sourcing are all laid out in MOS and I think that you should look at WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT. You are welcome to advance the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:GLAM/ARKive#WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT_when_writing_in-line_citations. Snowman (talk) 08:35, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are fine; Snowmanradio's view is disputed. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:36, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User Aurous can reed the discussion for himself. Snowman (talk) 16:01, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Meh, I'll be following the discussion. I'll make any necessary changes once a clear consensus has been reached about what to do. Aurous One (talk) 21:17, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. When you recently edited Striped Leaf-nosed Bat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tsavo National Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:58, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]