User talk:Autunno2022

April 2024

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Filippo Biagioli, from its old location at User:Autunno2022/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 10:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rich Smith Hi.

Thank you very much Autunno2022 (talk) 10:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Filippo Biagioli (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Filippo Biagioli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Autunno2022! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @SafariScribe, good morning. Thank you. They marked my draft as promotional. It is not promotional. I am Filippo Biagioli and as per the rules, I also wrote it on my page. I also included all the references and notes. But they continued to say that it was promotional. However, I will take your advice as a great help. As soon as I rewrite the draft, I will come and ask in your suggestion space.

Thank you very much Autunno2022 (talk) 06:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:V

Hello! When you add new information to Wikipedia articles, please cite WP:Reliable sources that specifically state the information you are adding to the Wikipedia article. For more information, please see WP:V. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:11, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the library at the Peggy Guggenheim Collection, the museum's own website is not an independent source. If you can find an independent WP:Reliable source that states that the library is a noteworthy (that is, very important) part of the Collection, then we can cite that source. Frankly, from looking at the collection's webpage about the library, it appears unremarkable to me, as museum libraries go. Also, to mention only your book in the description of the library implies that that book is the most important item in the library, which would, in itself, require a source to establish. If you think there are other noteworthy aspects of the collection that we do not mention, and you cite independent reliable sources about them, then you can summarize what the sources say in the article. Again, please review WP:RS carefully. All the best. -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message, and good luck. For more advice about writing in Wikipedia, see WP:NAU. -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]