User talk:Aviones de pasajeros
May 2012
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Air India fleet with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:23, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- You saw this? Aviones de pasajeros (talk) 11:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Sock template
[edit]Please do not place {{sockpuppet}} on user's pages as you did at User talk:Jetstreamer without significantly better evidence.--v/r - TP 19:56, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- You also tell him never do that again? He put sockpuppet warning on my page without evidence and insulted me as not good faith for removing telling it ok to put sockpuppet warnings without evidence to other users. Aviones de pasajeros (talk) 20:06, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- I strongly suggest you put away the battleground mentality and listen to those with more experience on Wikipedia than you. You are putting yourself on the fast track to losing the editing privilege. You've not been insulted and if you took it as an insult then maybe working in a collaborative environment isn't the right place for you.--v/r - TP 20:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- User talk:Jetstreamer accusing others as sockpuppet without evidence is good for working in a collaborative environment? Aviones de pasajeros (talk) 20:38, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- Doing likewise isn't going to win you any battles. You are responsible for your behavior despite the behavior of others. See WP:NOTTHEM.--v/r - TP 20:40, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- My mistake not to call admin to prove innocence when he accused me sockpuppet? Aviones de pasajeros (talk) 20:46, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- He has evidence to support his claim, you do not. You did it as retribution. Look, I'm getting tired of arguing with you. If your here to work collaboratively, you need to focus on what you are doing that is causing the problem. If you do think he is a sockpuppet, in the future you should gather the evidence and create an WP:SPI case for it. Beyond that, doing to him what he has done to you isn't going to get you anywhere other than blocked. Have a good day.--v/r - TP 20:56, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- My mistake not to call admin to prove innocence when he accused me sockpuppet? Aviones de pasajeros (talk) 20:46, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- Doing likewise isn't going to win you any battles. You are responsible for your behavior despite the behavior of others. See WP:NOTTHEM.--v/r - TP 20:40, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- User talk:Jetstreamer accusing others as sockpuppet without evidence is good for working in a collaborative environment? Aviones de pasajeros (talk) 20:38, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- I strongly suggest you put away the battleground mentality and listen to those with more experience on Wikipedia than you. You are putting yourself on the fast track to losing the editing privilege. You've not been insulted and if you took it as an insult then maybe working in a collaborative environment isn't the right place for you.--v/r - TP 20:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at TAAG Angola Airlines. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Naohiro19 revertvandal (talk) 09:46, 26 May 2012 (UTC)